[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fTCGR4wE6Sa_ZH04nloE93AAmYInBfXXUE-oD940cQCw":3},{"answer":4,"createTime":5,"id":6,"options":7,"origin":12,"question":16,"related":17,"source":28,"type":29},[],"2023-12-19 15:20:27",116837295,[8,9,10,11],"监察委员会","人民检察院","人民法院","公安机关",{"courseId":13,"courseImg":14,"courseName":15},"9b2a70ff69b76534d61048520852bb24","https:\u002F\u002Ftihai-oss-cloud.itihey.com\u002Fimg\u002F870d786924444025e26fa815b3fca2e7.jpg","刑事诉讼法学本科2023秋徐丹彤","有权发布通缉令的机关是( )",[18,30,39,48,57,60,69,78,87,94],{"answer":19,"createTime":20,"id":21,"options":22,"question":27,"source":28,"type":29},[],"2023-12-19 15:20:26",116837268,[23,24,25,26],"(4)","(1)(2)","(5)","(3)","某县公安局以局长韩麟为首组成侦破小组,对一起共同抢劫案立案侦查,查明犯罪嫌疑人赵某、钱某、孙某、李某涉嫌抢劫. (1)侦查过程中,孙某的辩护律师李某未与孙某商量,提出本案侦查员张权与被害人是邻居,关系密切,申请其回避.侦查科长立即停止了张权的侦查工作. (2)接着钱某申请韩麟回避,理由是他与被害人之父是老战友,关系密切.上级公安机关作出了回避决定. 在法院审理期间,赵某提出书记员李丽原是本案侦查人员,后调至法院工作,不应担任本案书记员;李某提出公诉人陈明在案件审查起诉过程中曾和被害人一起吃饭,应当回避;孙某提出陪审员王丹相貌凶恶,语气严厉,不应参与案件的审判. (3)审判长当庭决定陈明回避 (4)审判长当庭驳回李某的回避申请 (5)审判长当庭驳回孙某的回避申请 问:本案回避程序中,不属于违法的是( )","v1",0,{"answer":31,"createTime":20,"id":32,"options":33,"question":38,"source":28,"type":29},[],116837276,[34,35,36,37],"自诉人","辩护人","被告人","犯罪嫌疑人","刑事诉讼中的当事人,不包括( )",{"answer":40,"createTime":20,"id":41,"options":42,"question":47,"source":28,"type":29},[],116837283,[43,44,45,46],"在执业活动中知悉犯罪嫌疑人、被告人曾经实施过的犯罪,应及时告知司法机关","在侦查期间可以向犯罪嫌疑人核实证据","会见在押的犯罪嫌疑人、被告人,可以了解案件有关情况","辩护律师会见犯罪嫌疑人、被告人时,公安机关、检察院可以监听","关于辩护律师在刑事诉讼中享有的权利和承担的义务,下列说法正确的是( )",{"answer":49,"createTime":5,"id":50,"options":51,"question":56,"source":28,"type":29},[],116837291,[52,53,54,55],"执行拘传时","执行拘留时","扣押物证、书证时","执行传唤时","( ),遇有紧急情况,不另用搜查证也可以进行搜查",{"answer":58,"createTime":5,"id":6,"options":59,"question":16,"source":28,"type":29},[],[8,9,10,11],{"answer":61,"createTime":5,"id":62,"options":63,"question":68,"source":28,"type":29},[],116837302,[64,65,66,67],"应当对讯问的过程进行录音或者录像","对录音或录像可以剪接","根据案件的需要对讯问的过程进行录音或者录像","可以对讯问的过程进行录音或者录像","对于可能判处无期徒刑、死刑的案件,或者其他重大犯罪案件,下列说法正确的是( )",{"answer":70,"createTime":5,"id":71,"options":72,"question":77,"source":28,"type":29},[],116837307,[73,74,75,76],"上一级公安机关","上一级人民检察院","同级人民法院","同级人民检察院","公安机关对人民检察院不批准逮捕的决定,认为有错误的时候,可以要求复议,但是必须将被拘留的人立即释放.如果意见不被接受,可以向( )提请复核",{"answer":79,"createTime":5,"id":80,"options":81,"question":86,"source":28,"type":29},[],116837313,[82,83,84,85],"犯罪已过追诉时效期限的","犯罪嫌疑人、被告人立功的","犯罪情节轻微,不需要判处刑罚的","犯罪嫌疑人、被告人自首的","有下列情形之一的,不追究刑事责任,已经追究的,应当撤销案件,或者不起诉,或者终止审理,或者宣告无罪:( )",{"answer":88,"createTime":5,"id":89,"options":90,"question":93,"source":28,"type":29},[],116837322,[25,91,92,24],"(3)(4)","(1)(6)","某市发生一起抢劫杀人案,犯罪分子抢走被害人曹某劳力士手表一块,手机一部,索尼牌随身听一部,现金1800元,并在曹某头上连砍两刀.后曹某被过路行人及时发现,送往医院抢救后脱险.公安机关经过侦查收集到如下证据: (1)被害人曹某说作案人是其同事蒋某.蒋某抢走其手表一块、手机一部、随身听一部及现金1800元,并在他身上连砍两刀.后被过路行人及时发现,送往医院抢救后脱险. (2)在现场提取了可疑脚印,经鉴定分别是曹某和蒋某以及送曹某去医院的行人所留,此外没有其他人的脚印. (3)搜查蒋某住处,收集到手表一块,手机一部,随身听一部.经辨认,属曹某被抢之物.同时发现菜刀一把,木柄上留有血迹. (4)经专家鉴定,该菜刀木柄上的血迹的血型与曹某的血型完全一致,菜刀的形状也和曹某的伤口基本吻合. (5)与蒋某同住一房间的倪某证实:案发当夜,蒋某回来很晚,一回来就洗衣服、刷鞋.问蒋怎么回事,蒋说碰见一个行人被车撞伤,他帮忙把人送到医院,身上沾了很多血. (6)蒋某被讯问时,承认自己最近欠了很多债,整天被人追债,只好铤而走险,向自己的同事曹某下手.抢得的现金已挥霍. 问:上述证据中属于直接证据的是( )",{"answer":95,"createTime":5,"id":96,"options":97,"question":99,"source":28,"type":29},[],116837331,[11,10,9,98],"监狱","在刑事诉讼中不享有侦查权的国家机关是( )"]