[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f5AIMn3Gmy3J5l_nzV-TzR7BFJUteoAYFu_QC27jNC7s":3},{"answer":4,"createTime":5,"id":6,"options":7,"origin":12,"question":19,"related":20,"source":24,"type":25},[],"2024-03-23 11:36:48",135207738,[8,9,10,11],"将结点标记为叶结点,其类别标记为父结点中样本最多的类","将结点标记为叶结点,其类别标记为父结点中样本最少的类","将结点标记为叶结点,其类别标记为父结点中任意一个类","从其他结点获得样本,继续进行划分",{"count":13,"courseId":14,"courseImg":15,"courseName":16,"workId":17,"workName":18},8,"940516b64f509296bdfcc66a6a46b4db","https:\u002F\u002Ftihai-oss-cloud.itihey.com\u002Fimg\u002F25b30343053994e8940089572d36015b.jpg","Machine Learning 机器学习","work_33384294","机器学习-第四章 章节测试","决策树划分时,若当前结点包含的样本集合为空,则应该怎么做",[21,26,35,44,53,62,71,80],{"answer":22,"createTime":5,"id":6,"options":23,"question":19,"source":24,"type":25},[],[8,9,10,11],"v1",0,{"answer":27,"createTime":5,"id":28,"options":29,"question":34,"source":24,"type":25},[],135207739,[30,31,32,33],"当前属性集为空,或所有样本在所有属性上取值相同","当前属性集不为空,或所有样本在所有属性上取值相同","当前结点包含的样本集合为空,或当前属性集为空","当前结点包含的样本集合为空,或所有样本在所有属性上取值相同","决策树划分时,当遇到以下哪种情形时,将结点标记为叶节点,其类别标记为当前样本集中样本数最多的类",{"answer":36,"createTime":5,"id":37,"options":38,"question":43,"source":24,"type":25},[],135207740,[39,40,41,42],"信息增益准则对可取值较少的属性有所偏好","C4.5算法并不是直接选择增益率最大的候选划分属性","基尼指数反映了从数据集中随机抽取两个样本,其类别标记不一致的概率","基尼指数越小,数据集的纯度越高","下列说法错误的是()",{"answer":45,"createTime":5,"id":46,"options":47,"question":52,"source":24,"type":25},[],135207741,[48,49,50,51],"位于叶结点的样本越来越少","不会把数据中不该学到的特性学出来","决策树不会过拟合","叶结点一定学到一般规律","随着决策树学习时的深度增加,会发生什么现象",{"answer":54,"createTime":5,"id":55,"options":56,"question":61,"source":24,"type":25},[],135207742,[57,58,59,60],"决策树处理缺失值时,仅通过无缺失值的样例来判断划分属性的优劣","若数据中存在缺失值,决策树会仅使用无缺失的样例","若数据维度很高,不容易出现大量缺失值","对决策树,给定划分属性,若样本在该属性上的值缺失,会随机进入一个分支","下列说法正确的是()",{"answer":63,"createTime":5,"id":64,"options":65,"question":70,"source":24,"type":25},[],135207743,[66,67,68,69],"对于同一棵树,进行预剪枝和后剪枝得到的决策树是一样的","决策树的剪枝算法可以分为两类,分别称为预剪枝和后剪枝","预剪枝在树的训练过程中通过停止分裂对树的规模进行限制","后剪枝先构造出一棵完整的树,然后通过某种规则消除掉部分节点,用叶子节点替代","关于剪枝,下列说法错误的是()",{"answer":72,"createTime":5,"id":73,"options":74,"question":79,"source":24,"type":25},[],135207744,[75,76,77,78],"降低;降低","增加;基本不变","基本不变;基本不变","基本不变;增加","预剪枝欠拟合风险(),后剪枝欠拟合风险()",{"answer":81,"createTime":5,"id":82,"options":83,"question":88,"source":24,"type":25},[],135207745,[84,85,86,87],"预剪枝显著减少了决策树的训练时间开销和测试时间开销","预剪枝降低了过拟合风险","预剪枝基于贪心策略","预剪枝仅在划分后泛化性能提高时进行划分,因此欠拟合风险基本不变","下面关于预剪枝的说法错误的是()"]