[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f4VryhK2oMKS_hlSSPqx7NlHLlyfJRlH4wDHpGxBc4qc":3},{"id":4,"source":5,"question":6,"options":7,"answer":8,"related":9,"type":48,"origin":56,"createTime":49},139200614,"v1","高度盖然性标准是指当事人提供的证据使法官对待证事实的发生形成绝对的确信.( )",[],[],[10,23,33,44,50],{"id":11,"source":5,"question":12,"options":13,"answer":18,"related":19,"type":20,"origin":21,"createTime":22},65622117,"负有举证证明责任的当事人提供的证据,人民法院经审查并结合相关事实,确信待证事实的存在具有( )的,应当认定该事实存在",[14,15,16,17],"可能性","一般可能性","多数可能性","高度可能性",[],[],0,null,"2023-06-16T18:20:13+08:00",{"id":24,"source":5,"question":25,"options":26,"answer":31,"related":32,"type":20,"origin":21,"createTime":22},65622118,"对一方当事人为反驳负有举证证明责任的当事人所主张事实而提供的证据,人民法院经审查并结合相关事实,认为待证事实真伪不明的,应当认定该事实( )",[27,28,29,30],"存在","不存在","有可能存在","有可能不存在",[],[],{"id":34,"source":5,"question":35,"options":36,"answer":41,"related":42,"type":43,"origin":21,"createTime":22},65622119,"当事人对( ),人民法院确信该待证事实存在的可能性能够排除合理怀疑的,应当认定该事实存在",[37,38,39,40],"欺诈、胁迫、恶意串通事实的证明","口头遗嘱或者赠与事实的证明","乘人之危","重大误解",[],[],1,{"id":4,"source":5,"question":6,"options":45,"answer":46,"related":47,"type":48,"origin":21,"createTime":49},[],[],[],3,"2024-04-19T19:52:51+08:00",{"id":51,"source":5,"question":52,"options":53,"answer":54,"related":55,"type":48,"origin":21,"createTime":49},139200615,"所谓排除合理怀疑是指对于事实的认定,已没有符合常理的、有根据的怀疑,实际上达到确信的程度.( )",[],[],[],{"courseName":57,"courseImg":58,"workName":59,"workId":60,"count":61,"courseId":62},"民事诉讼法","https:\u002F\u002Ftihai-oss-cloud.itihey.com\u002Fimg\u002Fe9dd63e9215412377589a720f1f4d82d.png","《证明标准》测试题","299c26950cbf44e5a5958915cd763b3e",5,"ca507d37220ec0011c3b6d3a4dc3372c"]