[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fjV9lObYJpoO6zvD9qHlcjgVNJTdXJVKMBabOjfCf1sg":3},{"answer":4,"createTime":5,"id":6,"options":7,"origin":12,"question":19,"related":20,"source":30,"type":31},[],"2024-11-01 07:55:57",164016484,[8,9,10,11],"刘某对王某的受伤负刑事责任","陈某致王某受伤,属于正当防卫,不负刑事责任","陈某致王某受伤,系防卫过当","刘某对陈某的重伤不负刑事责任,不构成抢劫罪致人重伤",{"count":13,"courseId":14,"courseImg":15,"courseName":16,"workId":17,"workName":18},25,"f62ed401d84c19ef6d4b7173db544b82","https:\u002F\u002Ftihai-oss-cloud.itihey.com\u002Fimg\u002F25b30343053994e8940089572d36015b.jpg","刑法学","work_38286576","4.正当防卫、紧急避险 客观题","刘某持西瓜刀闯进超市抢劫,超市员工陈某反击.二人扭打中,陈某夺下刀然后扔掉,碰巧砸中旁边的王某头部,致其重伤.刘某未取得财物,见状逃跑,出了超市后骑自行车逃跑.陈某追上,扑上前去,将刘某连人带车摔倒在地,刘某摔伤(轻伤),陈某也摔伤(重伤).下列说法正确的是",[21,32,41,50,59,62,70,79,88,97],{"answer":22,"createTime":5,"id":23,"options":24,"question":29,"source":30,"type":31},[],164016477,[25,26,27,28],"宋某持刀拦路抢劫武某,武某系武警退役人员,假装害怕,乘宋某放松警惕,突然攻击宋某,致其受伤.武某的行为不构成正当防卫","陈某骑摩托车找李某算账,找到李某,下了摩托车,拿铁棍追打李某.李某夺路而逃,逃至大路,甩掉陈某,看到陈某停在路边的摩托车,出于泄愤,将摩托车踹下河,致使价值万元的摩托车报废.李某的行为不构成正当防卫","甲、乙基于共同伤害的故意,报复周某.甲用刀刺向周某,周某将一旁的乙强拉过来挡在前面,致使乙被刺死.周某的行为不构成正当防卫","许某伤害韩某,韩某奋起反抗,导致许某摔倒,头部撞到桌角,倒地昏迷,嘴角抽搐.见此情景,韩某又抡起小板凳砸向许某头部,致其死亡.韩某的行为不构成正当防卫","关于正当防卫,下列说法错误的是","v1",0,{"answer":33,"createTime":5,"id":34,"options":35,"question":40,"source":30,"type":31},[],164016479,[36,37,38,39],"①不法侵害是否已经开始或者结束;②防卫人;③社会公众;④主客观相统一原则","①不法侵害是否已经开始或者结束;②社会公众;③防卫人;④罪刑相适应原则","①是否严重危害人身;②防卫人;③社会公众;④主客观相统一原则","①是否严重危害人身;②社会公众;③防卫人;④罪刑相适应原则","对于①,应当立足②在防卫时所处情境,按照③的一般认知,依法作出合乎情理的判断,不能苛求防卫人.对于防卫人因为恐慌、紧张等心理,对不法侵害是否已经开始或者结束产生错误认识的,应当根据④,依法作出妥当处理.关于上述空格内容,下列选项说法正确的是",{"answer":42,"createTime":5,"id":43,"options":44,"question":49,"source":30,"type":31},[],164016481,[45,46,47,48],"①具体犯罪行为,②具体罪名,③正在进行,④一般防卫","①具体罪名,②具体犯罪行为,③正在进行,④紧急避险","①具体犯罪行为,②具体罪名,③严重危及人身安全,④一般防卫","①具体罪名,②具体犯罪行为,③严重危及人身安全,④紧急避险","刑法第 20 条第 3 款:"对正在进行行凶、杀人、抢劫、强奸、绑架以及其他严重危及人身安全的暴力犯罪,采取防卫行为,造成不法侵害人伤亡的,不属于防卫过当,不负刑事责任".其中"杀人、抢劫、强奸、绑架"这四项,是指①,而不是指②,如果没有③,则适用④.下列选项匹配的是",{"answer":51,"createTime":5,"id":52,"options":53,"question":58,"source":30,"type":31},[],164016483,[54,55,56,57],"正当防卫","假想防卫","防卫过当","故意伤害","甲在自己家巷子口看到乙提着麻袋走出来,怀疑乙是偷狗的人,遂叫乙站住.乙放下麻袋就跑,甲紧追不舍,乙不慎被脚下石头绊倒.甲追上后,为了教训乙,对倒在地上的乙实施暴力,致其脑出血,后因脑出血而死亡.经查明,乙确有偷狗行为,麻袋里是偷的狗.甲属于",{"answer":60,"createTime":5,"id":6,"options":61,"question":19,"source":30,"type":31},[],[8,9,10,11],{"answer":63,"createTime":5,"id":64,"options":65,"question":69,"source":30,"type":31},[],164016485,[54,66,67,68],"紧急避险","故意伤害罪","无因管理","甲交通肇事,将行人乙撞成重伤.甲见乙受重伤,心生恐惧,刚想离开,被另一行人丙看到.丙见状要求甲将乙送至医院,甲不肯.丙无奈,动手将甲打伤,逼其将乙送至医院,最终乙得到救治.丙的行为应如何认定",{"answer":71,"createTime":5,"id":72,"options":73,"question":78,"source":30,"type":31},[],164016486,[74,75,76,77],"正当防卫中的不法"侵害"的范围,与紧急避险中的"危险"相同","对正当防卫中不法侵害是否"正在进行"的认定,与紧急避险中危险是否"正在发生"的认定相同","对正当防卫中防卫行为"必要限度"的认定,与紧急避险中避险行为"必要限度"的认定相同","若正当防卫需具有防卫意图,则紧急避险也须具有避险意图","关于正当防卫与紧急避险的比较,下列哪一选项是正确的",{"answer":80,"createTime":5,"id":81,"options":82,"question":87,"source":30,"type":31},[],164016487,[83,84,85,86],"为保护国家利益实施的防卫行为,只有当防卫人是国家工作人员时,才成立正当防卫","为制止正在进行的不法侵害,使用第三者的财物反击不法侵害人,导致该财物被毁坏的,对不法侵害人不可能成立正当防卫","为摆脱合法追捕而侵入他人住宅的,考虑到人性弱点,可认定为紧急避险","为保护个人利益免受正在发生的危险,不得已也可通过损害公共利益的方法进行紧急避险","关于正当防卫与紧急避险,下列哪一选项是正确的",{"answer":89,"createTime":5,"id":90,"options":91,"question":96,"source":30,"type":31},[],164016488,[92,93,94,95],"甲出于报复动机损害乙的财产,缺乏避险意图","甲从乙的鱼塘抽水,是不得已采取的避险行为","甲未能保全更大的权益,不符合避险限度要件","对2万元鱼苗的死亡,甲成立故意毁坏财物罪","鱼塘边工厂仓库着火,甲用水泵从乙的鱼塘抽水救火,致鱼塘中价值2万元的鱼苗死亡.仓库中价值2万元的商品因灭火及时未被烧毁.甲承认仓库边还有其他几家鱼塘,为报复才从乙的鱼塘抽水.关于本案,下列哪一选项是正确的",{"answer":98,"createTime":99,"id":100,"options":101,"question":106,"source":30,"type":31},[],"2024-11-01 07:55:58",164016489,[102,103,104,105],"甲的不救助行为独立构成不作为的故意杀人罪","甲的不救助行为独立构成不作为的过失致人死亡罪","甲的行为属于防卫过当","甲的行为仅成立正当防卫","甲对正在实施一般伤害的乙进行正当防卫,致乙重伤(仍在防卫限度之内).乙已无侵害能力,求甲将其送往医院,但甲不理会而离去.乙因流血过多死亡.关于本案,下列哪一选项是正确的"]