[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f8r4EgzS0tDZWQ1uDGreIlzlhRKEb8YFprSi2TYPCB54":3},{"answer":4,"createTime":5,"id":6,"options":7,"origin":12,"question":19,"related":20,"source":30,"type":31},[],"2024-12-05 14:50:50",169129735,[8,9,10,11],"国际条约","司法解释","法律","判例法",{"count":13,"courseId":14,"courseImg":15,"courseName":16,"workId":17,"workName":18},11,"aa865a7813feedda0546b7e54cfdaedc","https:\u002F\u002Ftihai-oss-cloud.itihey.com\u002Fimg\u002F5865f7bbb6ac03f4df94010d0b50a871.jpg","法理学（23ZJ06102、23JB06108）","work_39483351","24-25-1法理学作业(第六周)","在我国,法律渊源体系中不包括:( )",[21,32,35,44,53,62,68,78,87,96],{"answer":22,"createTime":5,"id":23,"options":24,"question":29,"source":30,"type":31},[],169129734,[25,26,27,28],"本案有利于统一执法标准,明确正当防卫与防卫过当的界限,有助于公众在面对类似案侧作出正确的行为,体现法的预测作用","《关于依法适用正当防卫制度的指导意见》对人们如何进行正当防卫具有指引作用","《关于依法适用正当防卫制度的指导意见》有助于维持社会治安、体现法的概范作用","检察机关认定赵宇的行为属于正当防卫,依法不负刑事责任,属于法的强制作用","李华与邹某(女,27岁)相识但不是太熟.2018年12月26日23时许,二人一同吃饭后到达邹某的暂住处,二人发生争吵,李华被邹某关在门外.李华强行踹门而入,殴打谩骂邹某.赵宇闻声下楼、见义勇为,将李华推倒在地,朝李华腹部踩一脚,致李华重伤二级.赵宇被刑拘,社会舆论一片哗然,后经检察机关纠正,认定赵宇的行为属于正当防卫,依法不负刑事责任.2020年8月28日,最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部联合发布《关于依法适用正当防卫制度的指导意见),本案例,下列哪一说法是正确的?( )","v1",0,{"answer":33,"createTime":5,"id":6,"options":34,"question":19,"source":30,"type":31},[],[8,9,10,11],{"answer":36,"createTime":5,"id":37,"options":38,"question":43,"source":30,"type":31},[],169129736,[39,40,41,42],"《中国公民收养子女登记办法》","《精神文明建设纲要》","《刑事判决书》","《关于法官王明等的任免决定》","下列选项中,属于规范性文件的是哪一个?( )",{"answer":45,"createTime":5,"id":46,"options":47,"question":52,"source":30,"type":31},[],169129737,[48,49,50,51],"主观能动性","广泛性","社会性","法律性","我国《民法典》规定,结婚年龄,男不得早于22周岁,女不得早于20周岁.这表明法律关系主体所具有的特有的性质是:( )",{"answer":54,"createTime":5,"id":55,"options":56,"question":61,"source":30,"type":31},[],169129738,[57,58,59,60],"所有的法律原则都具有指导性","有的法律原则具有规范性","所有的法律原则具有强制性","有的法律原则具有任意性","下列有关法律原则的说法不正确的是哪项?( )",{"answer":63,"createTime":64,"id":65,"options":66,"question":29,"source":30,"type":31},[],"2024-12-05 15:26:06",169137072,[25,26,67,28],"D.《关于依法适用正当防卫制度的指导意见》有助于维持社会治安、体现法的概范作用",{"answer":69,"createTime":64,"id":70,"options":71,"question":76,"source":30,"type":77},[],169137074,[72,73,74,75],"甲对火灾进行了文义解释","法官对火灾进行了比较解释","本案出现了法律解释方法的冲突适用模式","法官对火灾进行了体系解释","甲在乙保险公司为其电动车购买了保险.保险合同规定保险公司应当赔偿火灾导致的电动车损失.后甲的电动车因自燃损坏,甲向乙保险公司索赔,乙保险公司拒绝赔付.甲向法院起诉.庭审过程中,甲和乙保险公司就电动车自燃是否属于火灾产生了争议.甲认为火灾就是因火燃烧造成的灾害,自燃当然属于火灾.乙保险公司认为自燃不属于火灾.法官审理过程中认为在日常生活中,自燃属于火灾范围内,保险合同对火灾概念进行界定时虽未明确排除自燃情形,但是,保险合同有单独条款对自燃情形作了规定,因此保险合同规定的火灾并不包括自燃在内,遂判决甲败诉.关于本案,下列哪些说法是正确的?( )",1,{"answer":79,"createTime":64,"id":80,"options":81,"question":86,"source":30,"type":77},[],169137075,[82,83,84,85],"甲属于道德责任,法院无权裁判","法官以《民法典》为依据调解,体现了法的强制作用","甲的责任被减轻,属于协议免责","本案适用《民法典》,体现了时间效力中的"有利追溯"","2020年12月,甲开车无偿带好友乙出游,行驶中因不明来源的石子击穿挡风玻璃致乙受重伤.次月,乙诉至法院,要求甲赔偿.法官根据《民法典》第1217条的规定:"非营运机动车发生交通事故造成无偿搭乘人损害,属于该机动车一方责任的,应当减轻其赔偿责任,但是机动车使用人有故意或者重大过失的除外",认定甲的行为属于出于情谊的"好意同乘"行为.法官在调解时告知双方本案适用这一规定,乙最终同意减轻甲的责任,最终,双方以调解结案.对此,下列哪些表述是正确的?( )",{"answer":88,"createTime":64,"id":89,"options":90,"question":95,"source":30,"type":77},[],169137076,[91,92,93,94],"田某与学校的法律关系是调整性法律关系","田某与学校的法律关系是隶属型法律关系","学校与法院的法律关系是保护性法律关系","田某与学校的法律关系是保护性法律关系","北京某大学本科生田某因考试携带记有公式的字条被监考老师发现并上报到学校,学校作出了责令退学的处理决定,但当时并未执行.后在临近毕业时,学校以田某已被退学为由,不发给其毕业证、学位证及派遣证.田某不服,诉至法院,请求法院判令学校履行发放毕业证、学位证以及派遣证的法定职责.关于本案所涉及的法律关系,叙述正确的是( )",{"answer":97,"createTime":64,"id":98,"options":99,"question":104,"source":30,"type":77},[],169137077,[100,101,102,103],"李四的精神失常抢劫","王五家境窘迫,无力履行法律义务而违约","孙六因不知法而犯法,法官酌情减轻一定责任","张三的正当防卫伤人","免责是法律责任的免除,它包括若干情况,下列属于人道主义免责的是( )"]