[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fIo1WiGPb3as-I45vtvGsIDvjjEiG9IBAnrrVGrVrvcY":3},{"answer":4,"createTime":5,"id":6,"options":7,"origin":12,"question":19,"related":20,"source":31,"type":32},[],"2025-04-28 02:49:14",184937541,[8,9,10,11],"科技合作","经贸合作","能源合作","文化交流",{"count":13,"courseId":14,"courseImg":15,"courseName":16,"workId":17,"workName":18},20,"261e5cdbe3709025e432c469c6bee24e","https:\u002F\u002Ftihai-oss-cloud.itihey.com\u002Fimg\u002Ff2e3e8503a6aa141d972155b723b2a3f.png","形势与政策（2025春季学期）","work_43092033","第二次作业","是中美关系的&quot;压舱石&quot;和&quot;推进器&quot;,事关两国人民根 本利益和世界繁荣与稳定",[21,33,42,51,60,69,78,87,94,100],{"answer":22,"createTime":23,"id":24,"options":25,"question":30,"source":31,"type":32},[],"2025-04-28 02:49:13",184937532,[26,27,28,29],"中美关系是世界上最重要的双边关系之一","中美如何相处关乎世界前途命运","中美各自的成功是彼此的机遇而非挑战","中美关系是一道是否搞好的选择题","关于中美关系,下列表述不正确的是( )","v1",0,{"answer":34,"createTime":23,"id":35,"options":36,"question":41,"source":31,"type":32},[],184937533,[37,38,39,40],"战略认知","相互尊重","和平共处","互利共赢","问题始终是中美关系必须扣好的&quot;第一粒纽扣&quot;",{"answer":43,"createTime":23,"id":44,"options":45,"question":50,"source":31,"type":32},[],184937534,[46,47,48,49],"相互帮助","平等协商","互学互鉴","对话合作","中美建交以来的历史经验表明,中美不打交道是不行的,冲突 对抗的后果是谁都不能承担的,( )是唯一正确选择",{"answer":52,"createTime":23,"id":53,"options":54,"question":59,"source":31,"type":32},[],184937535,[55,56,57,58],"中国威胁","遏制与合作","战略竞争","中国新能源&quot;产能过剩&quot;","2024 年以来,美国一些政客持续炒作所谓( )论调,歪曲指责 中国的产业政策,泛化国家安全概念,企图联合盟友和伙伴推动对中国 新能源产业脱钩断链,遏制中国先进制造业和新能源产业的发展",{"answer":61,"createTime":23,"id":62,"options":63,"question":68,"source":31,"type":32},[],184937536,[64,65,66,67],"制度差异","意识形态问题","发展战略","冷战思维","当前中美实现和平共处,最大的障碍是( )",{"answer":70,"createTime":23,"id":71,"options":72,"question":77,"source":31,"type":32},[],184937537,[73,74,75,76],"&quot;保护人权&quot;","&quot;价值观外交&quot;","&quot;维护公理&quot;","&quot;自由开放&quot;","在涉港问题上,美国推行所谓( ),操弄&quot;人权&quot;议题,联动盟 友干涉香港事务",{"answer":79,"createTime":5,"id":80,"options":81,"question":86,"source":31,"type":32},[],184937538,[82,83,84,85],"&quot;金德尔伯格陷阱&quot;","&quot;中等收入陷阱&quot;","&quot;修昔底德陷阱&quot;","&quot;气候变化陷阱&quot;","历史充分证明,中美合则两利、斗则俱伤.( )不是历史的宿命, &quot;新冷战&quot;打不得也打不赢,对华遏制不明智、不可取, 也不会得逞",{"answer":88,"createTime":5,"id":89,"options":90,"question":93,"source":31,"type":32},[],184937539,[38,39,91,92],"合作共赢","互利互惠","是让中美两国能够走到一起的前提和基础,如今依然是两国 正确相处的应有之义",{"answer":95,"createTime":5,"id":96,"options":97,"question":99,"source":31,"type":32},[],184937540,[98,39,91,92],"互谅互让","是中美关系半个世纪以来的真实叙事,也是双方应当继续追 求的共同目标",{"answer":101,"createTime":5,"id":6,"options":102,"question":19,"source":31,"type":32},[],[8,9,10,11]]