[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fx9daYhvKum6ACenNXllgq-xcXIxTVDTOtp2M3DhNQUw":3},{"answer":4,"createTime":5,"id":6,"options":7,"origin":12,"question":19,"related":20,"source":30,"type":31},[],"2023-05-20 10:44:44",19734769,[8,9,10,11],"A. 在我国现行法条件下,执行时效在一定程度上损害诉讼时效的适用","B. 我国诉讼时效也是以实体性债权的时间限制为制度目标的,而执行时效并非是","C. 我国的诉讼时效制度只能适用于审判程序中","D. 我国审判程序和执行程序并无相对独立性",{"count":13,"courseId":14,"courseImg":15,"courseName":16,"workId":17,"workName":18},20,"9a89db063080e982090c653462079613","https:\u002F\u002Ftihai-oss-cloud.itihey.com\u002Fimg\u002F3eb7627341cd3e070a28898e3b9966c7.jpg","《民法学》系列：《民法总则原理拓展》","17111bc62f4b4018814989b0fe374710","-8-4","1. 下列说法正确的是",[21,32,41,49,52,60,70,79,88,97],{"answer":22,"createTime":5,"id":23,"options":24,"question":29,"source":30,"type":31},[],19734766,[25,26,27,28],"A. 在申请执行时效期间最后的六个月内因不可抗力或其他障碍不能行使请求权的,申请执行时效中止","B. 申请执行时效因申请执行双方当事人达成和解协议而中断","C. 生效法律文书规定债务人负有不作为义务的,申请执行期间从债务人违反不作为义务之日起起算","D. 申请执行时效因当事人一方提出履行要求中止","1. 关于申请执行时效说法错误的是","v1",0,{"answer":33,"createTime":5,"id":34,"options":35,"question":40,"source":30,"type":31},[],19734767,[36,37,38,39],"A. 尚不可执行债权的可执行化应受时间限制","B. 可执行债权的现实执行亦不受时间限制","C. 当事人的意思应对法定规则具有相同或相似的重塑能力","D. 法院在审查这些时间限制时应具有相同或相似的干预能力","1. 下列说法错误的是",{"answer":42,"createTime":5,"id":43,"options":44,"question":40,"source":30,"type":31},[],19734768,[45,46,47,48],"A.抗辩权发生说改变的只是诉讼时效的法律效力,并未直接改变其适用的对象和领域","B.诉讼时效制度只适用于尚不可执行债权且主要适用于执行程序","C.某项尚不可执行债权并未超过诉讼时效期间,且不存在任何其他阻碍其实现的事由时,就会因胜诉判决的作出而成为可执行债权","D.可执行债权是相对性的债权",{"answer":50,"createTime":5,"id":6,"options":51,"question":19,"source":30,"type":31},[],[8,9,10,11],{"answer":53,"createTime":5,"id":54,"options":55,"question":40,"source":30,"type":31},[],19734770,[56,57,58,59],"A. 执行时效应有的体系地位应当与诉讼时效并立","B. 诉讼时效与执行时效共同构成完整的债权实现的时间限制","C. 执行时效规范体系的重心已经完全从执行申请本身转移至执行名义项下的可执行债权","D. 执行时效是执行债权人公法性申请执行权的限制",{"answer":61,"createTime":5,"id":62,"options":63,"question":68,"source":30,"type":69},[],19734771,[64,65,66,67],"A.原告两年后才向法院起诉,诉讼时效已过","B.诉讼时效期间为两年,从伤势确诊时开始计算,因此诉讼时效未过","C.原告向法院起诉没有超过诉讼时效","D.该案的诉讼时效应当从撞车之时开始计算","王某骑自行车被一违章车辆撞倒,王某当时未感到损伤,只是自行车被撞坏,通过协商,司机赔偿了自行车费300元.但两年后王某感到经常头晕,经过医院检查确诊为中度脑震荡,原因就是上次的撞车事件.王某为此花了3000元治疗费.王某出院后要求当时的司机赔偿,司机不同意,于是王某起诉至法院.下列说法错误的是:( )",1,{"answer":71,"createTime":5,"id":72,"options":73,"question":78,"source":30,"type":69},[],19734772,[74,75,76,77],"A.债权的行使未定期限的,则诉讼时效从权利成立并生效时起算","B.人身伤害的损害赔偿的诉讼时效期间,一律从受伤害之日起算","C.附停止条件或起始期的请求权,自条件成立或期限届至时起算","D.违约金及违约赔偿请求权应自债权得请求时起算","诉讼时效的期间从权利人知道或应当知道其权利被侵害时起算.下列表述哪些是正确的",{"answer":80,"createTime":5,"id":81,"options":82,"question":87,"source":30,"type":69},[],19734773,[83,84,85,86],"A. 在审判程序中,通过诉讼时效限制尚不可执行债权,以让审判法院据此决定是否发布具有强制执行力的给付判决","B. 在执行程序中,通过执行时效限制可执行债权,以让执行法院据此决定是否实施具体的强制执行措施","C. 目前,立法者强调了执行时效的管制功能","D. 目前,立法者对执行时效的设置是基于当事人处分的需要","下列说法正确的是",{"answer":89,"createTime":5,"id":90,"options":91,"question":96,"source":30,"type":69},[],19734774,[92,93,94,95],"A.申请执行的期限,从法律文书规定履行期间的最后2日起计算","B.法律文书规定分期履行的,从规定的每次履行期间的最后2日起计算","C.法律文书未规定履行期间的,从法律文书生效之日起计算","D.申请执行时效的中止、中断,适用法律有关诉讼时效中止、中断的规定","执行申请的说法正确的是",{"answer":98,"createTime":5,"id":99,"options":100,"question":19,"source":30,"type":69},[],19734775,[101,102,103,104],"A. 权利实现的时间限制而言,人们可以分别从实体或程序的角度规制","B. 可以将权利实现的时间限制看作消灭时效","C. 可以将权利实现的时间限制看作诉讼时效或执行时效","D. 执行时效是在执行程序中针对可执行债权的时间限制"]