[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$ffpXLlB_0n8yKMHH5VywGXYSgr_YRQg2N_sAy67StkT8":3},{"answer":4,"createTime":5,"id":6,"options":7,"origin":12,"question":19,"related":20,"source":30,"type":59},[],"2026-03-24 22:36:59",327808560,[8,9,10,11],"这个三段论的大前提是"所有真正的爱国者是理性主义者"","这个三段论的中项是"真正的爱国者"","这个三段论是EAI式第三格","这个三段论违反了三段论的规则5"如果有一个前提否定,那么结论否定",所以无效",{"count":13,"courseId":14,"courseImg":15,"courseName":16,"workId":17,"workName":18},11,"53e1d2ef4961cca8eea3e23969ad2cb9","https:\u002F\u002Ftihai-oss-cloud.itihey.com\u002Fimg\u002F03a579384a6dc297c89809b582fcc767.png","默认课程","666d0b098c674a06bf95c361e9b0281c","第三章测试","关于三段论"没有真正的爱国者是狭隘的民族主义者;所有真正的爱国者是理性主义者;所以,有的狭隘的民族主义者是理性主义者."下列判断正确的是( )",[21,32,41,50,60,69,72,81,86,91],{"answer":22,"createTime":5,"id":23,"options":24,"question":29,"source":30,"type":31},[],327808555,[25,26,27,28],"如果q则p;p;所以q","如果p则q;p;所以q","如果p则q;q;所以p","如果p则q;所以q","推理:若狄仁杰为大唐直臣,则当谏言还政李唐;狄仁杰乃是大唐直臣;故狄仁杰当谏言还政李唐.约定:p: 狄仁杰为大唐直臣;q: 狄仁杰当谏言还政李唐.根据词典,该推理的形式是( )","v1",0,{"answer":33,"createTime":5,"id":34,"options":35,"question":40,"source":30,"type":31},[],327808556,[36,37,38,39],""有些有角动物是肉食动物"为真",""所有有角动物都是肉食动物"为真",""有些有角动物不是肉食动物"为真",""所有有角动物都不是肉食动物"为假","假设"没有有角动物是肉食动物"是真的,根据对当方阵原理下列判断正确的是( )",{"answer":42,"createTime":5,"id":43,"options":44,"question":49,"source":30,"type":31},[],327808557,[45,46,47,48],"这个三段论是AEE第三格","这个三段论是EEE第二格","这个三段论违反了中项必须周延一次的规则,所以无效","这个三段论违反了在结论中周延的项在前提中也必须周延的规则,所以无效","关于三段论"所有没有道德的人都是没有烦恼的人;所有圣人都不是没有道德的人;所以,所有圣人都不是没有烦恼的人."下列判断正确的是( )",{"answer":51,"createTime":5,"id":52,"options":53,"question":58,"source":30,"type":59},[],327808558,[54,55,56,57],"演绎推理的前提被要求为结论的真提供必然的支持","一个演绎推理要么是有效的要么是无效的","有效性是对演绎推理之要求的评价","演绎推理的有效性取决于推理形式","关于演绎推理与有效性,下列说法正确的是",1,{"answer":61,"createTime":5,"id":62,"options":63,"question":68,"source":30,"type":59},[],327808559,[64,65,66,67],""所有大学教授是风趣的演讲者"为真",""没有大学教授是风趣的演讲者"为假",""有些大学教授是风趣的演讲者"为真",""所有大学教授不是风趣的演讲者"为假","假设"有些大学教授不是风趣的演讲者"是假的,根据对当方阵原理下列判断正确的是( )",{"answer":70,"createTime":5,"id":6,"options":71,"question":19,"source":30,"type":59},[],[8,9,10,11],{"answer":73,"createTime":74,"id":75,"options":76,"question":79,"source":30,"type":80},[],"2026-03-24 22:41:06",327809464,[77,78],"正确","错误","演绎推理的前提能够为结论提供必然的支持,而归纳推理的前提不能为结论提供必然的支持",3,{"answer":82,"createTime":74,"id":83,"options":84,"question":85,"source":30,"type":80},[],327809465,[77,78],""没有天才是墨守成规者;所以,有些非墨守成规者不是非天才."换质位推理有效",{"answer":87,"createTime":74,"id":88,"options":89,"question":90,"source":30,"type":80},[],327809466,[77,78],""所有成功者都是善于思考者;所以,所有不善于思考者都是不成功者."换质位推理无效",{"answer":92,"createTime":74,"id":93,"options":94,"question":95,"source":30,"type":80},[],327809467,[77,78],"推理是"如果小张是杀人犯,那么小张一定到过现场;小张到过现场;所以小张是杀人犯."是有效推理"]