[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fRAOLcWuWyDD1D6UzgdH9IJ8j4lqkMwTUbE1kYDrYhQ4":3},{"answer":4,"createTime":5,"id":6,"options":7,"origin":12,"question":15,"related":16,"source":24,"type":25},[],"2025-12-08 09:00:38",1080756989,[8,9,10,11],"亚当·斯密","约翰·纳什","冯.诺伊曼","摩根斯坦",{"courseImg":13,"courseName":14},"https:\u002F\u002Ftihai-oss-cloud.itihey.com\u002Fimg\u002Fb466548be1880a5d93542c7c2b0000c7.png","[共享课]经济博弈论（山东联盟）",""囚徒困境"博弈的均衡解是( )提出的",[17,26,35,44,54,57,64,73,82,91],{"answer":18,"createTime":5,"id":19,"options":20,"question":23,"source":24,"type":25},[],1080756978,[21,22],"存在","不存在","春秋战国时期,齐威王与将军田忌赛马.齐威王有A、B、C三匹马,田忌有a、b、c三匹马.已知这六匹马按奔跑速度由高到低排序为A、a、B、b、C、c.赛三局,每一局齐威王与田忌各出一匹马,每匹马只能出场一次.每一局中的胜者赢败方1枚金币.以上信息为双方的共同知识,且两个参与者都是理性的,这也为双方的共同知识.这个博弈是否存在纯策略纳什均衡?( )","v2",0,{"answer":27,"createTime":5,"id":28,"options":29,"question":34,"source":24,"type":25},[],1080756981,[30,31,32,33],"(给,同归于尽)","(不给,不同归于尽)","(不给,同归于尽)","(给,不同归于尽)","乙向甲索要1000元,并且威胁甲如果不给就与他同归于尽.当然甲不一定会相信乙的威胁.那么子博弈完美纳什均衡是( )",{"answer":36,"createTime":5,"id":37,"options":38,"question":43,"source":24,"type":25},[],1080756983,[39,40,41,42],"(0.4,0.6)","(0.5,0.5)","(0.3,0.7)","(0.5,0.6)","设一个地区选民的观点在[0,1]区间上均匀分布,竞选一个公职的每个候选人同时宣布他们的竞选立场,即选择0到1之间的一个点.选民观察候选人的立场,然后将选票投给立场与自己的观点最接近的候选人.比如,如果有两个候选人,宣布的立场分别为x1=0.4和x2=0.8,那么观点在x=0.6左边的所有选民都会投候选人1的票,而观点在x=0.6右边的所有选民都会投候选人2的票,候选人1将以60%的选票获胜.再设如果有候选人的立场相同,则立场相同的候选人将平分该立场所获得的选票,得票领先的候选人票数相同时则通过抛硬币来决定哪个候选人当选.每个候选人并不考虑自己对观点的真正偏好,而只关心能否获得更多的票以当选.如果只有两个候选人,纳什均衡是( )",{"answer":45,"createTime":5,"id":46,"options":47,"question":52,"source":24,"type":53},[],1080756986,[48,49,50,51],"参与人的信念一致","参与人为信念付出行动","只看对方的选择","大家合谋","协调博弈发生的条件是( )",1,{"answer":55,"createTime":5,"id":6,"options":56,"question":15,"source":24,"type":25},[],[8,9,10,11],{"answer":58,"createTime":5,"id":59,"options":60,"question":63,"source":24,"type":25},[],1080756999,[61,62],"正确","错误","囚徒的囚徒博弈中两个囚徒之所以会出于困境,无法得到想要的结果,是因为两囚徒都不在乎坐牢试讲长短本身,只在乎不能比对方坐牢的时间更长.( )",{"answer":65,"createTime":5,"id":66,"options":67,"question":72,"source":24,"type":25},[],1080757003,[68,69,70,71],"2005","2004","1944","2008","托马斯.谢林( )年获得诺贝尔经济学奖",{"answer":74,"createTime":5,"id":75,"options":76,"question":81,"source":24,"type":53},[],1080757011,[77,78,79,80],"单阶段的均衡","博弈重复的次数","参与人的个数","求解方法","影响重复博弈均衡的主要因素有( )",{"answer":83,"createTime":5,"id":84,"options":85,"question":90,"source":24,"type":25},[],1080757015,[86,87,88,89],"唯一的纳什均衡","纳什均衡","混合战略均衡","多个均衡解","令G是阶段博弈,G(n)是G重复n次的重复博弈(n<∞).那么,如果G有( ),重复博弈G(n)的唯一子博弈精炼纳什均衡结果是阶段博弈G的纳什均衡重复n次",{"answer":92,"createTime":5,"id":93,"options":94,"question":96,"source":24,"type":25},[],1080757025,[61,95],"不正确","蜈蚣博弈可以采用逆向归纳法求解.( )"]