[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fBe3Nb3tXr_iLFXbDDnKP1pU7U-oxfP-M7CrFHJJOVmI":3},{"answer":4,"createTime":5,"id":6,"options":7,"origin":10,"question":13,"related":14,"source":22,"type":23},[],"2025-12-08 09:00:38",1080757025,[8,9],"正确","不正确",{"courseImg":11,"courseName":12},"https:\u002F\u002Ftihai-oss-cloud.itihey.com\u002Fimg\u002Fb466548be1880a5d93542c7c2b0000c7.png","[共享课]经济博弈论（山东联盟）","蜈蚣博弈可以采用逆向归纳法求解.( )",[15,24,33,42,52,61,67,76,85,94],{"answer":16,"createTime":5,"id":17,"options":18,"question":21,"source":22,"type":23},[],1080756978,[19,20],"存在","不存在","春秋战国时期,齐威王与将军田忌赛马.齐威王有A、B、C三匹马,田忌有a、b、c三匹马.已知这六匹马按奔跑速度由高到低排序为A、a、B、b、C、c.赛三局,每一局齐威王与田忌各出一匹马,每匹马只能出场一次.每一局中的胜者赢败方1枚金币.以上信息为双方的共同知识,且两个参与者都是理性的,这也为双方的共同知识.这个博弈是否存在纯策略纳什均衡?( )","v2",0,{"answer":25,"createTime":5,"id":26,"options":27,"question":32,"source":22,"type":23},[],1080756981,[28,29,30,31],"(给,同归于尽)","(不给,不同归于尽)","(不给,同归于尽)","(给,不同归于尽)","乙向甲索要1000元,并且威胁甲如果不给就与他同归于尽.当然甲不一定会相信乙的威胁.那么子博弈完美纳什均衡是( )",{"answer":34,"createTime":5,"id":35,"options":36,"question":41,"source":22,"type":23},[],1080756983,[37,38,39,40],"(0.4,0.6)","(0.5,0.5)","(0.3,0.7)","(0.5,0.6)","设一个地区选民的观点在[0,1]区间上均匀分布,竞选一个公职的每个候选人同时宣布他们的竞选立场,即选择0到1之间的一个点.选民观察候选人的立场,然后将选票投给立场与自己的观点最接近的候选人.比如,如果有两个候选人,宣布的立场分别为x1=0.4和x2=0.8,那么观点在x=0.6左边的所有选民都会投候选人1的票,而观点在x=0.6右边的所有选民都会投候选人2的票,候选人1将以60%的选票获胜.再设如果有候选人的立场相同,则立场相同的候选人将平分该立场所获得的选票,得票领先的候选人票数相同时则通过抛硬币来决定哪个候选人当选.每个候选人并不考虑自己对观点的真正偏好,而只关心能否获得更多的票以当选.如果只有两个候选人,纳什均衡是( )",{"answer":43,"createTime":5,"id":44,"options":45,"question":50,"source":22,"type":51},[],1080756986,[46,47,48,49],"参与人的信念一致","参与人为信念付出行动","只看对方的选择","大家合谋","协调博弈发生的条件是( )",1,{"answer":53,"createTime":5,"id":54,"options":55,"question":60,"source":22,"type":23},[],1080756989,[56,57,58,59],"亚当&middot;斯密","约翰&middot;纳什","冯.诺伊曼","摩根斯坦","&quot;囚徒困境&quot;博弈的均衡解是( )提出的",{"answer":62,"createTime":5,"id":63,"options":64,"question":66,"source":22,"type":23},[],1080756999,[8,65],"错误","囚徒的囚徒博弈中两个囚徒之所以会出于困境,无法得到想要的结果,是因为两囚徒都不在乎坐牢试讲长短本身,只在乎不能比对方坐牢的时间更长.( )",{"answer":68,"createTime":5,"id":69,"options":70,"question":75,"source":22,"type":23},[],1080757003,[71,72,73,74],"2005","2004","1944","2008","托马斯.谢林( )年获得诺贝尔经济学奖",{"answer":77,"createTime":5,"id":78,"options":79,"question":84,"source":22,"type":51},[],1080757011,[80,81,82,83],"单阶段的均衡","博弈重复的次数","参与人的个数","求解方法","影响重复博弈均衡的主要因素有( )",{"answer":86,"createTime":5,"id":87,"options":88,"question":93,"source":22,"type":23},[],1080757015,[89,90,91,92],"唯一的纳什均衡","纳什均衡","混合战略均衡","多个均衡解","令G是阶段博弈,G(n)是G重复n次的重复博弈(n&lt;&infin;).那么,如果G有( ),重复博弈G(n)的唯一子博弈精炼纳什均衡结果是阶段博弈G的纳什均衡重复n次",{"answer":95,"createTime":5,"id":6,"options":96,"question":13,"source":22,"type":23},[],[8,9]]