[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fpCbkqdrYWUPJOr-J89HOnTtCFdXh9fdE9Fhn12vsL68":3},{"answer":4,"createTime":5,"id":6,"options":7,"origin":12,"question":18,"related":19,"source":29,"type":30},[],"2023-05-09 02:19:24",897166938,[8,9,10,11],"应当按照因斯的主张,适用奥地利法律确认其无民事行为能力,订做家具的合同无效","认定因斯有无民事行为能力可以适用英国、奥地利或匈牙利的法律,由法院选择","认定因斯有无民事行为能力可以适用英国、奥地利、匈牙利或者中国的法律,由法院选择","应当依据中国法律认定因斯有民事行为能力,其订做家具的合同有效",{"courseId":13,"courseImg":14,"courseName":15,"workId":16,"workName":17},"1000006736","https:\u002F\u002Ftihai-oss-cloud.itihey.com\u002Fimg\u002F87e443bf00a2cdf91f11de0d73cd1563.jpg","国际私法（华东政法大学）","41772523","国际私法（华东政法大学）教程考试","1998年8月,自称奥地利人的因斯向中国某家具店订做一套高级组合家具.该店按照因斯的要求完成全套家具的制做后要求汤姆付款提货.因斯拒绝付款,称奥地利法律规定的成年年龄为24岁,自己只有22岁,所以没有民事行为能力,订做家具的合同无效.明光家具店诉诸法院.经查,因斯为无国籍人,曾在英国、奥地利、匈牙利住过,其中在奥地利居住的时间最久,但因斯并未在任何国家定居,也没有住所.1995年底因斯来到中国,此后一直在中国居住.下列表述哪种是正确的?( )",[20,31,34,43,52,61,70,79,88,97],{"answer":21,"createTime":5,"id":22,"options":23,"question":28,"source":29,"type":30},[],897166926,[24,25,26,27],"冲突法规范","实体法规范","准据法规范","程序法规范","我国某中级人民法院在审理涉外民商事案件时,当根据中国法律适用某外国法律时,应当适用该外国的何种规范?( )","v2",0,{"answer":32,"createTime":5,"id":6,"options":33,"question":18,"source":29,"type":30},[],[8,9,10,11],{"answer":35,"createTime":5,"id":36,"options":37,"question":42,"source":29,"type":30},[],897166951,[38,39,40,41],"在A国起诉会发生转致","在B国起诉会发生转致","在两国中任何一国起诉都会发生反致","在两国中任何一国起诉都会发生转致","A国法规定,不动产的继承问题依不动产所在地法,B国法规定,不动产的法定继承依死者本国法,且两国都认为自己指定的法律包括冲突法.现有一个A国公民在B国去世,并在B国留有不动产.为此不动产继承发生争议,下列判断正确的是( )",{"answer":44,"createTime":5,"id":45,"options":46,"question":51,"source":29,"type":30},[],897166958,[47,48,49,50],"识别是解决援用哪一种冲突规范的前提","识别主要是一种限制外国法适用的手段","识别只能在首先确定法院管辖权后进行","如果两国制订相同的冲突规则,就不会产生识别冲突","对于识别,下列说法正确的是( )",{"answer":53,"createTime":5,"id":54,"options":55,"question":60,"source":29,"type":30},[],897166962,[56,57,58,59],"与案件有密切联系的法律","受理案件的法院所在地法","当事人自主选择的法律","合同缔结地的法律","在讲到"合同自体法"时,通常首先是指( )",{"answer":62,"createTime":5,"id":63,"options":64,"question":69,"source":29,"type":30},[],897166964,[65,66,67,68],"应当适用意大利法律,认定谭某无民事行为能力,所以谭某与刘某之间的买卖合同无效","应当适用中国法律,认定谭某有民事行为能力,谭某与刘某之间的买卖合同有效","认定谭某有无民事行为能力既可以适用中国法律,也可以适用意大利法律","认定谭某有无民事行为能力不能适用中国法律","中国公民谭某与其父母定居意大利.2003年,20岁的谭某回国探亲期间,与刘某订立一份买卖合同,约定谭某购买刘某提供的一整套VCD设备.刘某交货后,几经催促,谭某均未付款.后来,谭某提出,意大利法律规定的成年年龄为22岁,所以其没有民事行为能力,双方订立的合同无效.刘某诉诸中国法院.就此,下列表述哪个是不正确的?( )",{"answer":71,"createTime":5,"id":72,"options":73,"question":78,"source":29,"type":30},[],897166966,[74,75,76,77],"先决问题","识别","公共秩序保留制度","二级识别","甲国汽车制造商A将其产品出口到乙国,乙国公民B从进口商C处购得一辆汽车.由于汽车设计存在缺陷而使B受伤.B以A违约提起诉讼,乙国法院根据该国法律认为此问题属于侵权,而非违约,遂决定适用有关侵权的法律规定.法院的此行为属于国际私法领域中的( )",{"answer":80,"createTime":5,"id":81,"options":82,"question":87,"source":29,"type":30},[],897166986,[83,84,85,86],"经常居所地法律","行为地法律","法院地法律","住所地法律","我国《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第11条规定:自然人的民事权利能力适用( )",{"answer":89,"createTime":5,"id":90,"options":91,"question":96,"source":29,"type":30},[],897167002,[92,93,94,95],"单边冲突规范","双边冲突规范","重叠型冲突规范","选择性冲突规范",""依照本法适用经常居所地法律,自然人经常居所地不明的,适用其现在居所地法律".这是一条( )",{"answer":98,"createTime":5,"id":99,"options":100,"question":105,"source":29,"type":30},[],897167009,[101,102,103,104],"在伊朗履行的中国某石油公司与伊朗某石油公司共同开发伊朗油田的合同","在内蒙古履行的某中外合作经营企业合同","外国某企业和中国某企业在上海谈判签订的货物买卖合同","在青岛履行的某涉外工程承包合同","根据我国法律规定,下列选项中,必须适用中华人民共和国法律的是( )"]